It's no secret that I'm a fan of Quora, and I wrote a post some time ago describing why I like the service. To summarize, the lack of spam, the quality of the content, and the integrated social graph are all reasons why Quora has become my third social network, behind Facebook and Twitter (excluding location services, of course). I use it daily and still find it valuable, especially when trying to learn the ins and outs of the Silicon Valley culture that I am interested in, yet not currently a part of. Depending on the nature of my question, I often find myself typing it into Quora before I check the other usual sources, such as Google.
Robert Scoble, whom I like and follow around the internet, once agreed with that assessment. Seems as though he now disagrees. Today Robert said, contrary to his previous position, that Quora is a "horrid service for blogging." I agree with that, but Quora is not a blogging platform by design, it's a social network around asking and answering questions. So while I find it to be an effective tool for information sharing and curation, it still falls somewhere in between the shallow waters of Twitter and the depth and control of a personal blog, replacing neither.
The comparison he makes with Answers.com and Stack Exchange is a bit unfair. Answers.com, along with Yahoo! Answers, deserves an award for being the least useful services for Q&A in terms of content depth, partly owing to the anonymity of the service. Stack Exchange is extremely useful, but only for programming related topics. Quora provides more depth than Answers.com and Yahoo! Answers without the sort of niche specialization that you find on Stack Exchange (though there are exceptions). And I'm not even going to get into this silly Quora Review post about the issue, either, as I think it's petty and unhelpful. Let's stick with an analysis of the product, shall we?
Where I agree with Scoble is regarding Quora's problems with moderation and user accountability. I agree that, increasingly, we're seeing issues with the accountability of Quora's moderation system and this is an issue that could end up getting worse as Quora fights to starve off irrelevancy and keep quality high (remember how I mentioned Yahoo! Answers? That's a model for what they don't want to become). I've personally noticed an influx of new users over the last few months, which has also led to an increase in low quality contributions. Quora needs to address that problem without alienating their users. It's a delicate balance.
Another open question he mentions is whether or not Quora is worth $80 million. But that's a whole different topic for another day.
